franz kiekeben
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Philosophy
  • Publications
  • Contact

A MISTAKE SOME ATHEISTS MAKE

7/14/2016

0 Comments

 
Atheists often maintain that it is their opponents who have the burden of proof: they are the ones making a claim – that there is a God – and so it is up to them to provide the reasons or evidence in support of that claim.

Now, in a sense, this is entirely correct. Theists do have a burden of proof. And if all that these atheists are saying is that they lack belief because they have not yet seen any good evidence, then it is in fact their opponents' job to make their case.

However, many atheists who make the above claim also often say that God doesn't exist. But to say that God doesn't exist is also to make a claim, and thus to incur a burden of proof. And yet, when challenged to justify their positive disbelief, some of these atheists revert to the “atheism is merely a lack of belief” line, and deny that they have to justify anything.

The mistake here is obvious – almost too simple to seem worth pointing out – yet is one I've seen several times online. And it just opens the door to criticism of atheists.

Perhaps there is some confusion in all this as a result of the oft-repeated claim that “one cannot prove a negative”. If one cannot prove a negative, and the statement “God does not exist” is a negative, then one cannot prove “God does not exist” – and doesn't it then follow that one cannot have a burden to prove such a thing? I've seen at least one YouTuber apparently arguing along such lines.

But, to begin with, a burden of proof – in spite of its name – is only a burden to provide justification for a claim, and not strictly speaking to prove it. (When someone makes a claim, they should be ready to provide a reason for accepting it as true. As a general rule, however, it is too much to demand that they be able to prove the claim is true.) Furthermore, it simply isn't the case that one cannot prove a negative, so this entire argument rests on a confusion anyway.

My suggestion is that nonbelievers need to make a clear choice between so-called positive and negative atheism. Positive atheists are those who make the claim that God does not exist, whereas negative atheists merely lack belief in God. Positive atheism, in other words, is “traditional” atheism – the belief that there is no God; negative atheism covers all other nontheists.

If one is merely a negative atheist, then one can place the burden of proof on one's opponents. As soon as one makes a claim that there is no God, however, then one has incurred a burden of proof.


0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    April 2022
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014

    Categories

    All
    Atheism
    Creationism
    Determinism And Free Will
    Ethics
    Infinity
    Politics And Religion
    Presuppositionalism

    RSS Feed

Link to my author's page on Amazon