franz kiekeben
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Philosophy
  • Publications
  • Contact

MORE ON WILLIAM LANE CRAIG'S MORAL ARGUMENT

10/29/2015

2 Comments

 
Christian philosopher William Lane Craig maintains that atheists very often accept both premises of the following argument (while rejecting its conclusion, of course):

1. If there is no God, objective moral principles do not exist
2. But objective moral principles do exist
3. Therefore, there is a God

In particular, he accuses Richard Dawkins of doing this. But of course accepting the premises of this argument while denying its conclusion would be illogical, since the argument is formally valid. According to Craig, then, it seems Dawkins and these other atheists really are – as the “good book” says – fools.

But is there any reason to believe Craig's claim?

As evidence that Dawkins endorses the first premise of the argument, Craig quotes a well-known passage from River Out of Eden. “The universe that we observe,” Dawkins tells us, “has precisely the properties we should expect if there is, at bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil, no good, nothing but pitiless indifference.” However, what Dawkins is obviously pointing out here is that the amoral nature of reality is evidence of its lack of purpose or design, and hence of its lack of a creator. If there were a God who supposedly cares about sentient beings, one would not expect a universe of “blind physical forces” where “some people are going to get hurt, other people are going to get lucky, and you won't find any rhyme or reason in it, nor any justice” (as he states in the passage leading up to the above quote). And that's not the same as claiming that there are no objective moral principles that apply to human society.

But even if Dawkins did accept the first premise, Craig would have to show that he accepts the second one as well. And that's where his case is especially weak, for his evidence here is simply that Dawkins makes moral judgements. That is, Dawkins says that some things are right and others wrong, and that, according to Craig, shows that he believes in objective moral principles. What's more, this is all the evidence Craig presents with respect to other atheists who supposedly make the same mistake.

But expressing a moral viewpoint isn't the same thing as claiming that morality is objective, and Craig should know that. He acknowledges that there are moral relativists, who maintain that morality is relative to culture. And yet a relativist can certainly claim that something is right or wrong, even if his claim must be made from a particular cultural point of view. Similarly, subjectivists – those who say that morality is ultimately based on subjective preferences or desires – can, and do, express their own moral preferences.

Craig therefore has failed to show that Dawkins or any other atheist accepts the two premises of the moral argument.


(For a complete refutation of Craig's argument, see chapter 5 of my book, The Truth about God.)


2 Comments
XXx
11/3/2015 05:58:08 pm

Is that a valid argument? I think not.

Reply
Franz Kiekeben
11/4/2015 09:22:30 am

Actually, it IS valid - that is, there's nothing wrong with its logic. When logicians say an argument is valid, they do not mean the conclusion is true; they mean that the logic is correct - which is another way of saying that the conclusion follows from the premises. In other words, IF the premises are true, then the conclusion is true.

However, if a valid argument has one or more false premises (which the above one does), then the conclusion may very well be false.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    April 2022
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014

    Categories

    All
    Atheism
    Creationism
    Determinism And Free Will
    Ethics
    Infinity
    Politics
    Presuppositionalism

    RSS Feed

Link to my author's page on Amazon